Introduction: Reading comprehension is a complex skill that involves several linguistic and cognitive processes. While the evidence indicates that expository texts are more difficult and cognitively demanding than narrative texts, the contribution of core executive functions to comprehension has seldom been compared between these genres, particularly in adolescents. The present study examined the association of executive functions with expository and narrative text comprehension in Argentinean high school students, while controlling for their verbal skills. Method: One hundred and twenty-one 12 to15-year-old high school students participated in our study (75.2% of them were girls). Participants completed pencil and paper tests in reading comprehension (TLC-II), vocabulary (BAIRES) and reading efficacy (TECLE), as well as computerised tests in shifting, inhibition and verbal and visuospatial working memory from the Cognitive Self-Regulation Test Battery (TAC). Results: We found lower comprehension scores in the expository text. Shifting and verbal working memory were predictors of reading comprehension beyond verbal skills, but we did not observe significant differences between text types. Comprehension in general was lower for third-year students. Conclusion: In accord with the literature, we observed greater difficulties for expository text comprehension, and a general contribution of shifting and working memory to both types of text. We found no conclusive evidence of differences in this association between text types. Third-year students’ comprehension might have been affected by the impact of the pandemic on their schooling trajectory.

---

Keywords:
Reading comprehension, executive functions, adolescence, narrative text, expository text

04_RSP_30(2)_23025_Role

American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.).

Abusamra, V, Cartoceti, R., Ferreres, A., Raiter, A., De Beni, R., & Cornoldi, C. (2014). Test Leer para Comprender II (TLC-II). Paidós.

Abusamra, V., Difalcis, M., Martínez, G., Low, D., & Formoso, J. (2020). Cognitive skills involved in reading comprehension of adolescents with Low educational opportunities. Languages, 5(3), 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages5030034

Andrés, M. L., Canet-Juric, L., García-Coni, A., Olsen, C. D., Ver­nucci, S., Galli, J. I., Introzzi, I.,  & Richaud, M. C. (2022). Executive functions and academic performance: The moderating role of distress tolerance. Mind, Brain, and Education, 16(3), 197-208. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12330

Avramovich, A., & Yeari, M. (2022). The Role of Executive Functions in Reading Comprehension by Adolescents with ADHD. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 39(4), 277-299. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2022.2103054

Avramovich, A., & Yeari, M. (2023). The Role of Executive Functions in Reading Comprehension by Adolescents with ADHD: The Case of Domain-General Versus Domain-Specific Functions. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2023.2192705

Baddeley, A. D. (2021). Developing the Concept of Working Memory: The Role of Neuropsychology1. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 36(6), 861–873. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acab060

Barrio-Cantalejo, I. M., Simón-Lorda, P., Melguizo, M., Escalona, I., Marijuán, M. I., & Hernando, P. (2008). Validación de la Escala INFLESZ para evaluar la legibilidad de los textos dirigidos a pacientes. Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra, 31(2), 135-152. https://doi.org/10.4321/s1137-66272008000300004

Barreyro, J. P., Injoque-Ricle, I., Formoso, J., & Burin, D. (2019). Computerized working memory battery (BIMeT-V): Studying the relation between working memory, verbal reasoning and reading comprehension. Trends in Psychology, 27(1), 53-67. https://doi.org/10.9788/TP2019.1-05

Best, R. M., Floyd, R. G., & McNamara, D. S. (2008). Differential competencies contributing to children’s comprehension of narrative and expository texts. Reading Psychology, 29(2), 137-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710801963951

Borella, E., Carretti, B., & Pelegrina, S. (2010). The specific role of inhibition in reading comprehension in good and poor comprehenders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(6), 541–552. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219410371676

Borella, E., & de Ribaupierre, A. (2014). The role of working memory, inhibition, and processing speed in text comprehension in children. Learning and Individual Differences, 34, 86-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.05.001

Butterfuss, R., & Kendeou, P. (2018). The role of executive functions in reading comprehension. Educational Psychology Review, 30(3), 801-826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9422-6

Canet-Juric, L., Vernucci, S., Zamora, E., Introzzi, I., & Andres, M. L. (2021). Analysis of omission and commission errors in a visual search task by school-age children. Studies in Psychology, 42(1), 47-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/02109395.2020.1857583

Canet Juric, L., Tabullo, A., Gros, C. R., Galli, J. I., Andrés, M. L., & García-Coni, A. (2022). Efectos de las dificultades en el funcionamiento ejecutivo sobre la comprensión de textos en niños de primaria. Traslaciones. Revista Latinoamericana de Lectura y Escritura, 9(17), 124-148. https://doi.org/10.48162/rev.5.066

Cartwright, K. B., Lee, S. A., Taboada Barber, A., DeWyngaert, L. U., Lane, A. B., & Singleton, T. (2020). Contributions of executive function and cognitive intrinsic motivation to university students’ reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(3), 345-369. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.273

Clinton, V., Taylor, T., Bajpayee, S., Davison, M. L., Carlson, S. E., & Seipel, B. (2020). Inferential comprehension differences between narrative and expository texts: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reading and Writing, 33(9), 2223-2248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10044-2

Cortada de Kohan, N. (2004). Test de Aptitud Verbal Buenos Aires. Revista Evaluar, 4(1), 113-114. https://doi.org/10.35670/1667-4545.v4.n1.602

De Beni, R., Cornoldi, C., Carretti, B. & Meneghetti, B. (2003). Nuova guida alla comprensione del testo (vol. 1.). Erickson.

Demagistri, M. S., Richards, M. M., & Juric, L. C. (2014). Incidence of executive functions on reading comprehension performance in adolescents. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 12(2), 343-370. https://doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.33.13146

Diamond A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135-168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750

Duke, N. K., & Cartwright, K. B. (2021). The science of reading progresses: Communicating advances beyond the simple view of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(S1), S25-S44. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.411

Eason, S. H., Goldberg, L. F., Young, K. M., Geist, M. C., & Cutting, L. E. (2012). Reader-Text Interactions: How Differential Text and Question Types Influence Cognitive Skills Needed for Reading Comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 515–528. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027182

Ferreres, A., Abusamra, V., Casajús, A., & China, N. (2011) Adaptación y estudio preliminar de un test breve para evaluar la eficacia lectora (TECLE). Revista de Neuropsicología Latino-americana, 3, 1-7.

Follmer, D. J. (2018). Executive function and reading comprehension: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist, 53(1), 42-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1309295

Follmer, D., & Sperling, R. A. (2018). Interactions between reader and text: Contributions of cognitive processes, strategy use, and text cohesion to comprehension of expository science text. Learning and Individual Differences, 67, 177-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.08.005

Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. (2017). Unity and diversity of executive functions: Individual differences as a window on cognitive structure. Cortex, 86, 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2016.04.023

Gardner, D. (2004). Vocabulary input through extensive reading: A comparison of words found in children’s narrative and expository reading materials. Applied Linguistics, 25(1), 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.1.1

Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., & Louwerse, M. M. (2003). What do readers need to learn in order to process coherence relations in narrative and expository text? In A. P. Sweet & C. E. Snow (Eds.), Rethinking reading comprehension (pp. 82–98). Guilford.

Georgiou, G. K., & Das, J. P. (2018). Direct and indirect effects of executive function on reading comprehension in young adults: Direct and Indirect Effects of Executive Function. Journal of Research in Reading, 41(2), 243-258. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12091

Hoover, W. A., & Tunmer, W. E. (2018). The simple view of reading: Three assessments of its adequacy. Remedial and Special Education, 39(5), 304-312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518773154

Introzzi, I., & Canet-Juric, L. (2019). TAC: Tareas de Autorregulación Cognitiva. [TAC: Cognitive Self-Regulation Tasks]. https://tac.com.ar/evaluacion/

Johann, V., Könen, T., & Karbach, J. (2020). The unique contribution of working memory, inhibition, cognitive flexibility, and intelligence to reading comprehension and reading speed. Child Neuropsychology, 26(3), 324-344. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2019.1649381

Kieffer, M. J., Mancilla-Martinez, J., & Logan, J. K. (2021). Executive functions and English reading comprehension growth in Spanish-English bilingual adolescents. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 73, 101238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2021.101238

Lundine, J., Harnish, S., McCauley, R., Blackett, D., Zezinka, A., Chen, W., & Fox, R. (2018). Adolescent summaries of narrative and expository discourse: Differences and predictors. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 49(3), 551-568. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_LSHSS-17-0105

Mar, R. A., Li, J., Nguyen, A. T. P., & Ta, C. P. (2021). Memory and comprehension of narrative versus expository texts: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28(3), 732-749. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01853-1

Ministerio de Educación de la Nación (2023a). Aprender 2022: Resumen ejecutivo. Nivel primario. https://bit.ly/49D3T6b

Ministerio de Educación de la Nación (2023b). Aprender 2022: Resumen ejecutivo. Nivel secundario. https://bit.ly/3uasleN

Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49-100. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0734

Nouwens, S., Groen, M., Kleemans, T., & Verhoeven, L. (2021). How executive functions contribute to reading comprehension. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(1), 169-192. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12355

Ober, T. M., Brooks, P. J., Plass, J. L., & Homer, B. D. (2019). Distinguishing Direct and Indirect Effects of Executive Functions on Reading Comprehension in Adolescents. Reading Psychology, 40(6), 551-581. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2019.1635239

OECD (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What students know and can do. PISA, OECD Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en

Ozuru, Y., Best, R., Bell, C., Witherspoon, A., & McNamara, D. S. (2007). Influence of question format and text availability on the assessment of expository text comprehension. Cognition and Instruction, 25(4), 399-438. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000701632371

Peng, P., Barnes, M., Wang, C. C., Wang, W., Li, S., Swanson, H. L., Dardick, W., & Tao, S. (2018). Meta-analysis on the relation between reading and working memory. Psychological Bulletin, 144(1), 48-76. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000124

Perfetti, C., & Stafura, J. (2014). Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 22-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.827687

Rauch, D. P., & Hartig, J. (2010). Multiple-choice versus open-ended response formats of reading test items: A two-dimensional IRT analysis. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 52(4), 354-379.

Richard, M. M., Introzzi, I., Zamora, E., & Vernucci, S. (2017). Analysis of internal and external validity criteria for a computerized visual search task: A pilot study. Applied Neuropsychology: Child, 6(2), 110-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2015.1083433

Richard, M. M., Vernucci, S., Stelzer, F., Introzzi, I., & Guardia-Olmos, J. (2020). Exploratory data analysis of executive functions in children: A new assessment battery. Current Psychology: A Journal for Diverse Perspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues, 39(5), 1610-1617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9860-4

Shokrkon, A., & Nicoladis, E. (2022). The directionality of the relationship between executive functions and language skills: A literature review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 848696. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.848696

Spencer, M., Richmond, M. C., & Cutting, L. E. (2020). Considering the role of executive function in reading comprehension: A structural equation modeling approach. Scientific Studies of Reading: The Official Journal of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, 24(3), 179-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2019.1643868

Taber, K.S. (2018). The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science and Education, 48, 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2

Vernucci, S., Canet-Juric, L., Andrés, M. L., & Burin, D. I. (2017). Comprensión lectora y cálculo matemático: el rol de la memoria de trabajo en niños de edad escolar. Psykhe, 26(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.7764/psykhe.26.2.1047

World Medical Association (2013). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA, 310(20), 2191–2194. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053

Wu, Y., Barquero, L. A., Pickren, S. E., Taboada Barber, A., & Cutting, L. E. (2020). The relationship between cognitive skills and reading comprehension of narrative and expository texts: A longitudinal study from Grade 1 to Grade 4. Learning and Individual Differences, 80, 101848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101848

Yeniad, N., Malda, M., Mesman, J., van Ijzendoorn, M. H., & Pieper, S. (2013). Shifting ability predicts math and reading performance in children: A meta- analytical study. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.10.004