Introduction/Objective: In romantic relationships, jealousy can influence how individuals feel emotionally and interact with their partners. This study analysed the metric properties of the Brief Jealousy Scale (BJS) in young adults from Peru using current methods. Method: A total of 297 individuals were selected to participate in the study. They averaged 26.52 years of age (with a variation of 7.75 years), and 74.10% were women. The study used a technique called Item Response Theory (IRT) with a two-parameter model to confirm the structure and reliability of the BJS. Result: The BJS demonstrated high reliability and fit through goodness-of-fit indices. DIF analysis indicated slight gender biases in some items, reflecting differences in the perception of jealousy between men and women. Conclusions: The study highlights the importance and usefulness of the Jealousy Scale in relationships, as it helps to understand relationship dynamics and guides interventions. Future studies should address issues such as participant selection and study design and examine whether the scale can be used in different cultures.

---

Keywords:
Jealousy, romantic relationships, psychometric validation, item response theory, gender differences.

02_RSP_31(2)_24031_Evidence

Ahlen, J., Bjureberg, J., Lenhard, F., Wahlund, T., Linde, J., & Mataix-Cols, D. (2023). Obsessional jealousy in a community sample: Association with relationship factors, impairment and perceived treatment needs. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(1), 298-311. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjc.12409

Aloyce, D., Mshana, G., Peter, E., Malibwa, D., Buller, A. M., Mchome, Z., Kapiga, S., & Stöckl, H. (2024). Pathways of romantic jealousy to intimate partner violence in Mwanza, northern Tanzania. Family Relations, 73(2), 843-857. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12880

Ariza, A., Viejo, C., & Ortega, R. (2022). El amor romántico y sus mitos en Colombia: una revisión sistemática. Suma Psicológica, 29(1), 77-90. https://doi.org/10.14349/sumapsi.2022.v29.n1.8

Asún, R. A., Rdz-Navarro, K., & Alvarado, J. M. (2017). The sirens’ call in psychometrics: The invariance of IRT models. Theory & Psychology, 27(3), 389-406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354317706272

Bean, G. J., & Bowen, N. K. (2021). Item response theory and confirmatory factor analysis: Complementary approaches for scale development. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 18(6), 597-618.

Bernhard, K. F. (1986). Psychology roots. In K. F. Benard (Ed.), Jealousy: Its nature and treatment (pp. 35-52). Thomas.

Brandes, O., Stern, A., & Doron, G. (2020). “I just can’t trust my partner”: Evaluating associations between untrustworthiness obsessions, relationship obsessions and couples violence. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders, 24, 100500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocrd.2019.100500

Bringle, R. G., & Buunk, B. (2021). Examining the causes and consequences of jealousy: Some recent findings and issues. In R. Gilmour & S. Duck (Eds.), The Emerging Field of Personal Relationships, (pp. 225-240). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003164005-18

Buller, A. M., Pichon, M., Chevalier, C., & Treves-Kagan, S. (2023). The role of gender and romantic jealousy in intimate partner violence against women, a mixed-methods study in Northern Ecuador. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 25(2), 223-240. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2022.2031299

Chalmers, R. P. (2012). mirt : A multidimensional item response theory package for the R environment. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(6), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i06

Chalmers, R. P. (2018). Model-based measures for detecting and quantifying response Bias. Psychometrika, 83(3), 696-732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-018-9626-9

Chalmers, R. P., Counsell, A., & Flora, D. B. (2016). It might not make a big DIF. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 76(1), 114-140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164415584576

Christensen, K. B., Makransky, G., & Horton, M. (2017). Critical values for Yen’s Q 3: Identification of local dependence in the Rasch model using residual correlations. Applied Psychological Measurement, 41(3), 178-194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621616677520

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Abingdon. Routledge.

Colasanti, M., Ricci, E., Cardinale, A., Amati, F., Mazza, C., Biondi, S., Ferracuti, S., & Roma, P. (2023). Homicide-Suicide in Italy between 2009-2018: An epidemiological update and time series analysis. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-023-09550-0

Cuesta, M. T. (2006). Intervención cognitiva en un caso de celotipia. Acción Psicológica, 4(1), 71-82.

DeSteno, D., Valdesolo, P., & Bartlett, M. Y. (2006). Jealousy and the threatened self: Getting to the heart of the green-eyed monster. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(4), 626-641. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.626

DeVellis, R. F. (2006). Classical test theory. Medical Care, 44(11), S50-S59. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000245426.10853.30

Diotaiuti, P., Valente, G., Mancone, S., Girelli, L., Cavicchiolo, E., & Chirico, A. (2022). Validation study of the Italian brief version of the multidimensional jealousy scale: Psychometric properties, measurement invariance across gender, and convergent validity. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1013584

Diotaiuti, P., Valente, G., Mancone, S., Grambone, A., & Chirico, A. (2021). Metric goodness and measurement invariance of the Italian brief version of interpersonal reactivity index: A study with young adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.773363

Drasgow, F., Levine, M. V., & Williams, E. A. (1985). Appropriateness measurement with polychotomous item response models and standardized indices. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 38(1), 67-86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1985.tb00817.x

Du Toit, M. (2003). IRT from SSI: Bilog-MG, multilog, parscale, testfact. Scientific Software International.

Echeburúa, E., Amor, P. J., & Corral, P. (2009). Hombres violentos contra la pareja: trastornos mentales y perfiles tipológicos. Pensamiento Psicológico, 6(13), 27-36. https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/pensamientopsicologico/article/view/141

Echeburúa, E., & Fernández-Montalvo, J. (2001). Celos en la pareja: una emoción destructiva. Ariel.

Edlund, J. E., Buller, D. J., Sagarin, B. J., Heider, J. D., Scherer, C. R., Farc, M., & Ojedokun, O. (2019). Male sexual jealousy: Lost paternity opportunities? Psychological Reports, 122(2), 575-592. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294118806556

Elphinston, R. A., Feeney, J. A., Noller, P., Connor, J. P., & Fitzgerald, J. (2013). Romantic jealousy and relationship satisfaction: The costs of rumination. Western Journal of Communication, 77(3), 293-304. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2013.770161

Epskamp, S. (2015). semPlot: Unified visualizations of structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 22(3), 474-483.

Fairchild, A. J., Horst, S. J., Finney, S. J., & Barron, K. E. (2005). Evaluating existing and new validity evidence for the Academic Motivation Scale. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(3), 331-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.11.001

Felt, J. M., Castaneda, R., Tiemensma, J., & Depaoli, S. (2017). Using person fit statistics to detect outliers in survey research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00863

Gjersing, L., Caplehorn, J. R., & Clausen, T. (2010). Cross-cultural adaptation of research instruments: Language, setting, time and statistical considerations. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-10-13

Guerrero, L. K., Trost, M. R., & Yoshimura, S. M. (2005). Romantic jealousy: Emotions and communicative responses. Personal Relationships, 12(2), 233-252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1350-4126.2005.00113.x

Himawan, K. (2017). Jealousy and relationship satisfaction among Indonesian dating adults. PsyCh Journal, 6(4), 328-329. https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.195

Hirschauer, N., Grüner, S., Mußhoff, O., Becker, C., & Jantsch, A. (2020). Can p-values be meaningfully interpreted without random sampling? Statistics Surveys, 14, 71-91. https://doi.org/10.1214/20-SS129

Hoerger, M., & Currell, C. (2012). Ethical issues in Internet research. In S. J. Knapp, M. C. Gottlieb, M. M. Handelsman, & L. D. VandeCreek (Eds.), APA handbook of ethics in psychology, Vol. 2. Practice, teaching, and research (pp. 385–400). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13272-018

Islahulhaq, W. W., & Ratih, I. D. (2021). Classification of non-performing financing using Logistic Regression and Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique-Nominal Continuous (SMOTE-NC). International Journal of Advances in Soft Computing and Its Applications, 13(3), 116-128. https://www.i-csrs.org/Volumes/ijasca/2021.3.9.pdf

Jeanfreau, M. M., & Mong, M. (2019). Barriers to marital infidelity. Marriage and Family Review, 55(1), 23-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2018.1518821

Johnson, L. (2024). Jealousy as a correlate of intimate partner homicide-suicide versus homicide-only cases: National violent death reporting system, 2016-2020. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 54(4), 663-672. https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.13076

Kang, T., Cohen, A. S., & Sung, H.-J. (2009). Model selection indices for polytomous items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33(7), 499-518. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621608327800

Kaufman-Parks, A. M., Longmore, M. A., Giordano, P. C., & Manning, W. D. (2023). Inducing jealousy and intimate partner violence among young adults.  Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(9), 2802-2823. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407518802451

Kleinman, M., & Teresi, J. A. (2016). Differential item functioning magnitude and impact measures from item response theory models. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 58(1), 79-98.

Kyegombe, N., Stern, E., & Buller, A. M. (2022). “We saw that jealousy can also bring violence”: A qualitative exploration of the intersections between jealousy, infidelity and intimate partner violence in Rwanda and Uganda. Social Science & Medicine, 292, 114593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114593

Larsen, P. H. H., Bendixen, M., Grøntvedt, T. V., Kessler, A. M., & Kennair, L. E. O. (2021). Investigating the emergence of sex differences in jealousy responses in a large community sample from an evolutionary perspective. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85997-7

Lin, M., Lucas Jr, H. C., & Shmueli, G. (2013). Research commentary—too big to fail: large samples and the p-value problem. Information Systems Research, 24(4), 906-917. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24700283

Liu, C.-W., & Chalmers, R. P. (2018). Fitting item response unfolding models to Likert-scale data using mirt in R. Plos One, 13(5), e0196292. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196292

Mafla, A. C., Herrera-López, H. M., & Villalobos-Galvis, F. H. (2019). Psychometric approach of the revised illness perception questionnaire for oral health (IPQ-R-OH) in patients with periodontal disease. Journal of Periodontology, 90(2), 177-188. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.18-0136

Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2013). Goodness-of-fit assessment of item response theory models. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research & Perspective, 11(3), 71-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/15366367.2013.831680

Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Joe, H. (2014). Assessing approximate fit in categorical data analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 49(4), 305-328. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2014.911075

Myszkowski, N. (2021). Development of the R library “jrt”: Automated item response theory procedures for judgment data and their application with the consensual assessment technique. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 15(3), 426-438. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000287

Neemann, J., Hubbard, J., & Masten, A. S. (1995). The changing importance of romantic relationship involvement to competence from late childhood to late adolescence. Development and Psychopathology, 7(4), 727-750. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579400006817

Park, J. H., Sarwar, S., Hassett, L. C., Staab, J. P., & Fipps, D. C. (2024). Clinical characterization, course, and treatment of Othello syndrome: A case series and systematic review of the literature. Journal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry, 65(1), 89-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaclp.2023.09.006

Pfeiffer, S. M., & Wong, P. T. P. (1989). Multidimensional jealousy. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6(2), 181-196. https://doi.org/10.1177/026540758900600203

Pichon, M., Treves-Kagan, S., Stern, E., Kyegombe, N., Stöckl, H., & Buller, A. M. (2020). A mixed-methods systematic review: Infidelity, romantic jealousy and intimate partner violence against women. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(16), 5682. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165682

Pollet, T. V., & Saxton, T. K. (2020). Jealousy as a function of rival characteristics: Two large replication studies and meta-analyses support gender differences in reactions to rival attractiveness but not dominance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(10), 1428-1443. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220904512

Prieto, B. L. A., & Montesinos, M. B. (2021). Design and psychometric analysis of an instrument to assess jealousy. Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 24(1), 19-31. https://doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2021.24.1.3

Richardson, J. T. E., Slater, J. B., & Wilson, J. (2007). The National Student Survey: Development, findings and implications. Studies in Higher Education, 32(5), 557-580. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070701573757

Samejima, F. (1997). Graded response model. In Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory (pp. 85-100). Springer.

Sánchez, R. (2012). Emotional communication on romantic relationships: Design and validation of a measure in Mexico. Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 6(2), 211-226. https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.v6i2.102

Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461-464. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344136

Seo, D. G., & Jung, S. (2018). A comparison of three empirical reliability estimates for Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) Using a medical licensing examination. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00681

Toplu-Demirtaş, E., Akcabozan-Kayabol, N. B., Araci-Iyiaydin, A., & Fincham, F. D. (2022). Unraveling the roles of distrust, suspicion of infidelity, and jealousy in cyber dating abuse perpetration: An attachment theory perspective. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(3-4), NP1432–NP1462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520927505

Valentova, J. V., de Moraes, A. C., & Varella, M. A. C. (2020). Gender, sexual orientation and type of relationship influence individual differences in jealousy: A large Brazilian sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 157, 109805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109805

Ventura-León, J. (2024). IRTools [Software]. https://github.com/jventural/IRTools

Ventura-León, J., Caycho-Rodríguez, T., Barboza-Palomino, M., Aparco, V., & Rodas, N. (2018). Evidencias de validez e invarianza factorial de una Escala Breve de Celos en estudiantes Universitarios Peruanos. Propósitos y Representaciones, 6(2), 125-180. https://doi.org/10.20511/pyr2018.v6n2.216

Ventura-León, J., & Lino-Cruz, C. (2023). Love, jealousy, satisfaction and violence in young couples: A network analysis. Plos One, 18(5), e0285555. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285555

Ventura-León, J., Lino-Cruz, C., & Caycho-Rodríguez, T. (2023). Relationship satisfaction in young couples: Evidence for Validity of Short Scale Combining CFA and IRT. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 49(4), 420-431. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2022.2129119

Villagrán, A. M., Martín-Fernández, M., Gracia, E., & Lila, M. (2023). Validation of the perceived severity of intimate partner violence against women Scale in Ecuadorian Population. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicologia, 55, 29-37. https://doi.org/10.14349/rlp.2023.v55.4

White, G. L. (1981). Jealousy and partner’s perceived motives for attraction to a rival. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44(1), 24-30. https://doi.org/10.2307/3033859

Whittaker, T. A., & Worthington, R. L. (2016). Item response theory in Scale Development Research. The Counseling Psychologist, 44(2), 216-225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000015626273

Wickham, H. (2019). tidyverse: easily install and load the ’Tidyverse’. R package version 1.3.0. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/tidyverse/index.html

Wickham, H., Chang, W., Henry, L., Pedersen, T. L., Takahashi, K., Wilke, C., Woo, K., Yutani, H., & Dunnington, D. (2020). ggplot2: Create Elegant Data Visualisations Using the Grammar of Graphics (Version 3.3. 0)[Computer software]. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ggplot2/index.html

Wongvorachan, T., He, S., & Bulut, O. (2023). A comparison of undersampling, oversampling, and SMOTE methods for dealing with imbalanced classification in educational data mining. Information, 14(1), 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/info14010054

World Medical Association. (1964). Declaración de Helsinki. https://www.wma.net/es/que-hacemos/etica-medica/declaracion-de-helsinki/

Yuan, K.-H., & Zhong, X. (2013). Robustness of fit indices to outliers and leverage observations in structural equation modeling. Psychological Methods, 18(2), 121-136. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031604

Zablocki-Thomas, P. B., Savidge, L. E., Witczak, L. R., Ferrer, E., Hobson, B. A., Chaudhari, A. J., Freeman, S. M., & Bales, K. L. (2023). Neural correlates and effect of jealousy on cognitive flexibility in the female titi monkey (Plecturocebus cupreus). Hormones and Behavior, 152, 105352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2023.105352

Zandbergen, D. L., & Brown, S. G. (2015). Culture and gender differences in romantic jealousy. Personality and Individual Differences, 72, 122-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.08.035

Zickar, M. J., & Broadfoot, A. A. (2009). The partial revival of a dead horse? Comparing classical test theory and item response theory. In C. E. Lance & R. J. Vandenberg (Eds.), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity and fable in the organizational and social sciences (pp. 37-59). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.